Release Date: 2024-06-17

Perception of Climate Change and Social Confidence

Release Date: 2024-06-17

Efforts to deal with climate change and adaptation are currently on the agenda of many countries. Research and academic studies generally focus on two different perceptions of the emergence of climate change. The first is that climate change occurs as a natural process. The second is the perception that human activities, directly or indirectly, trigger [...]

Media Type
    Buy from

    Price may vary by retailers

    Work TypeBook Chapter
    Published inAgricultural Economics and Climate Change
    First Page191
    Last Page218
    DOIhttps://doi.org/10.69860/nobel.9786053359432.10
    Page Count28
    Copyright HolderNobel Tıp Kitabevleri
    Licensehttps://nobelpub.com/publish-with-us/copyright-and-licensing
    Efforts to deal with climate change and adaptation are currently on the agenda of many countries. Research and academic studies generally focus on two different perceptions of the emergence of climate change. The first is that climate change occurs as a natural process. The second is the perception that human activities, directly or indirectly, trigger and bring about climate change. In this study, the perception towards climate change and the level of social confidence towards climate change in Şanlıurfa province were investigated. According to the research findings, participants generally think that climate change exists. According to the participants, although climate change is a natural process, human activities have a greater impact on the occurrence of climate change. Participants who believe that climate change exists are generally male, single, urban residents, under the age of 28, with a high level of education, fixed and average/high household income. The same participants do not believe very much that the occurrence of climate change is a natural process. These participants attribute the emergence of climate change to human activities. Participants think that the measures taken by society, policy makers and practitioners against climate change risks are not sufficient. Especially the confidence levels of the participants who are male, single, living in the city, under the age of 28 and have a high level of education are quite low.

    Mehmet Resit Sevinc (Author)
    Assoc. Prof. Dr., Harran University
    https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0617-7822
    3Associate Professor Dr. Mehmet Reşit Sevinç completed his undergraduate education in the Department of Economics at Dokuz Eylül University (1997-2001). He received his master’s degree in Economics from the Institute of Social Sciences at Harran University (2002-2004) and his Ph.D. in Agricultural Economics from the Institute of Natural and Applied Sciences at Çukurova University (2009-2015). Associate Professor Dr. Sevinç began his academic career at Harran University in 2005 and continues to serve in the Department of Agricultural Economics at the Faculty of Agriculture at Harran University. Throughout his approximately 20-year academic career, he has conducted numerous studies in the fields of rural development, rural organization, agricultural marketing, and agricultural policy, and continues to do so.

    Gonul Sevinc (Author)
    Assistant Professor, Harran University
    https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6322-8844
    3Assistant Professor Dr. Gönül Sevinç completed her undergraduate education in the Department of Economics at Dokuz Eylül University (1997-2001). She received her master’s degree in Economics from the Institute of Social Sciences at Harran University (2005-2008) and her Ph.D. in Agricultural Economics from the Institute of Natural and Applied Sciences at Harran University (2009-2018). Assistant Professor Dr. Sevinç began her academic career at Harran University in 2007 and continues to serve in the Department of Agricultural Economics at the Faculty of Agriculture at Harran University. Throughout her approximately 20-year academic career, she has conducted numerous studies in the fields of rural development, rural organization, and agricultural policy, and continues to do so.

    • Ağıralan E, Sadioğlu U. İklim değişikliği farkındalığı ve toplum bilinci: İstanbul örneği. Anadolu Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi 2021;21:627–54. https://doi. org/10.18037/ausbd.959287.

    • Ahmed M. Introduction to Modern Climate Change. Andrew E. Dessler: Cambridge University Press, 2011, 252 pp, ISBN-10: 0521173159. The Science of the Total Environment 2020;734:139397. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.139397.

    • Atube F, Malinga GM, Nyeko M, Okello DM, Alarakol SP, Okello-Uma I. Determinants of smallholder farmers’ adaptation strategies to the effects of climate change: Evidence from northern Uganda. Agriculture & Food Security 2021;10:6. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40066-020-00279-1.

    • Aydoğdu MH, Cançelik M, Sevinç MR, Çullu MA, Yenigün K, Küçük N, et al. Are you happy to be a farmer? Understanding indicators related to agricultural production and influencing factors: GAP-Şanlıurfa, Turkey. Sustainability 2021a;13:12663. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132212663.

    • Aydoğdu MH, Cançelik M, Sevinç MR, Çullu MA, Yenigün K, Küçük N, et al. Is drought caused by fate? Analysis of farmers’ perception and its influencing factors in the irrigation areas of GAP-Şanlıurfa, Turkey. Water 2021b;13:2519. https://doi.org/10.3390/w13182519.

    • Birpınar ME. Küresel sorun iklim değişikliği: Gelişimi, uluslararası müzakereler ve Türkiye. Çevre, Şehir ve İklim Dergisi 2022;Ocak 2022:20–36.

    • Clayton S, Karazsia BT. Development and validation of a measure of climate change anxiety. Journal of Environmental Psychology 2020;69:101434. https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2020.101434.

    • Cvetković V, Grbić L. Public perception of climate change and its impact on natural disasters. Journal of the Geographical Institute “Jovan Cvijic”, SASA 2021;71:43–58. https://doi.org/10.2298/IJGI2101043C.

    • Davran MK, Sevinç MR, Cançelik M. Şanlıurfa ili köylerinde yaşlıların demografik ve sosyo-ekonomik durumları ile yoksulluk ve yaşlılık algıları. Elektronik Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi 2020;19:1–17. https://doi.org/10.17755/esosder.591786.

    • Demirbaş M, Aydın R. 21. Yüzyılın en büyük tehdidi: Küresel iklim değişikliği. Ecological Life Sciences (NWSAELS) 2020;15:163–79. https://doi.org/10.12739/ NWSA.2020.15.4.5A0143.

    • Dessler A. Introduction to Modern Climate Change. New York, NY, US: Cambridge University Press; 2016.

    • Ejelöv E, Nilsson A. Individual factors influencing acceptability for environmental policies: A review and research agenda. Sustainability 2020;12:2404. https:// doi.org/10.3390/su12062404.

    • Elsasser SW, Dunlap RE. Leading voices in the denier choir: Conservative columnists’ dismissal of global warming and denigration of climate science. American Behavioral Scientist 2013;57:754–76. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764212469800.

    • Fahey DW, Doherty SJ, Hibbard KA, Romanou A, Taylor PC. Physical drivers of climate change. In: Wuebbles DJ, Fahey DW, Hibbard KA, Dokken DJ, Stewart BC, Maycock TK, editors. Climate Science Special Report: Fourth National Climate Assessment, Volume I, Washington, DC, USA: U.S. Global Change Research Program; 2017, p. 73–113.

    • Gavin NT, Marshall T. Mediated climate change in Britain: Scepticism on the web and on television around Copenhagen. Global Environmental Change 2011;21:1035–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2011.03.007.

    • He B-J, Zhu J, Zhao D-X, Gou Z-H, Qi J-D, Wang J. Co-benefits approach: Opportunities for implementing sponge city and urban heat island mitigation. Land Use Policy 2019;86:147–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.05.003.

    • IPCC The Core Writing Team, Lee H, Romero J. Climate Change 2023: Synthesis Report. Geneva, Switzerland: IPCC; 2023.

    • IPCC The Core Writing Team, Pachauri RK, Meyer L. Climate Change 2014: Synthesis Report. Geneva, Switzerland: IPCC; 2014.

    • Işık A, Ulus Z. 18-24 yaş aralığındaki gençlerin iklim değişikliğine ilişkin düşüncelerinin değerlendirilmesi: Sinop gençlik merkezi örneği. Akademia Doğa ve İnsan Bilimleri Dergis 2021;7:126–40.

    • Korkmaz M, Şahin H. İklim değişikliği endişesini etkileyen faktörler: Mersin iline yönelik bir araştırma. Turkish Journal of Forest Science 2023;7:210–22. https://doi.org/10.32328/turkjforsci.1333268.

    • Lorcu F. Örneklerle Veri Analizi SPSS Uygulamalı. Ankara: Detay Yayıncılık; 2020.

    • Lwasa S, Buyana K, Kasaija P, Mutyaba J. Scenarios for adaptation and mitigation in urban Africa under 1.5 °C global warming. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability 2018;30:52–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2018.02.012.

    • Munoz-Carrier G, Thomsen D, Pickering GJ. Psychological and experiential factors affecting climate change perception: learnings from a transnational empirical study and implications for framing climate-related flood events. Environmental Research Communications 2020;2:045003. https://doi.org/10.1088/25157620/ab89f9.

    • Murshed M, Nurmakhanova M, Elheddad M, Ahmed R. Value addition in the services sector and its heterogeneous impacts on CO2 emissions: revisiting the EKC hypothesis for the OPEC using panel spatial estimation techniques. Environmental Science and Pollution Research 2020;27:38951–73. https://doi. org/10.1007/s11356-020-09593-4.

    • NASA. Climate Change 2024. https://science.nasa.gov/climate-change/ (accessed May 21, 2024).

    • Pielke RA. What is climate change? Energy & Environment 2004;15:515–20. https://doi.org/10.1260/0958305041494576.

    • Rankoana SA. Human perception of climate change. Weather 2018;73:367–70. https://doi.org/10.1002/wea.3204.

    • Semenza JC, Hall DE, Wilson DJ, Bontempo BD, Sailor DJ, George LA. Public perception of climate change: Voluntary mitigation and barriers to behavior change. American Journal of Preventive Medicine 2008;35:479–87. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.amepre.2008.08.020.

    • Sevinç MR, Davran MK, Sevinç G. Şanlıurfa’da kırsal kadınlar ve miras hakkı. The Journal of Turk-Islam World Social Studies 2017;4:240–51. https://doi. org/10.16989/TIDSAD.1303.

    • Sharifi A. Co-benefits and synergies between urban climate change mitigation and adaptation measures: A literature review. Science of The Total Environment 2021;750:141642. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.141642.

    • Sharman A. Mapping the climate sceptical blogosphere. Global Environmental Change 2014;26:159–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.03.003.

    • Treen KM, Williams HTP, O’Neill SJ. Online misinformation about climate change. WIREs Climate Change 2020;11:e665. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.665.

    • TÜİK. Adrese Dayalı Nüfus Kayıt Sistemi Sonuçları 2023. https://biruni.tuik. gov.tr/medas/?kn=95&locale=tr (accessed May 18, 2024).

    • Türkeş M. İklim diplomasisi ve iklim değişikliğinin ekonomi politiği. Bilim ve Ütopya 2022;332:31–45.

    • Türkeş M. Küresel iklimin korunması, iklim değişikliği çerçevesi sözleşmesi ve Türkiye. Tesisat Mühendisliği, TMMOB Makina Mühendisleri Odası, Süreli Teknik Yayın 2001;61:14–29.

    • UNCC. What is the Kyoto Protocol? 2024. https://unfccc.int/kyoto_protocol?gad_source=1&gclid=Cj0KCQjwxqayBhDFARIsAANWRnQ51OyWrPx5Jz7ga1L_A0CvNbfrRdYbRp1gV1z3dUbQSa_6rsQt3DQaAqecEALw_wcB (accessed May 19, 2024).

    • UNFCC. United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change 2024. https://unfccc.int/resource/ccsites/zimbab/conven/text/art01.htm (accessed May 19, 2024).

    • Uysal Ş, Gürer B. Çiftçilerin iklim değişikliği algı ve davranışlarını belirlemeye yönelik ölçeğin geliştirilmesi: Üzüm üreticileri örneği. Bahçe 2023;52:434–42.

    • Yamane T. Temel Örnekleme Yöntemleri. İstanbul: Literatür Yayıncılık; 2010.

    • Yılmaz V, Can Y, Şen H. Küresel ısınma ve küresel iklim değişikliğine ilişkin bilginin kaygı ile farkındalık üzerine etkisi: Bir yapısal eşitlik model önerisi. Researcher: Social Science Studies 2018;6:434–50.

    Share This Chapter!