Release Date: 2024-06-07

Artificial Insemination in Honeybees

Munire Turhan (Author)

Release Date: 2024-06-07

Xenobiotics are chemical substances that are not naturally found in the environment but are introduced through human activities. These substances include pesticides, pharmaceuticals, industrial chemicals, and various synthetic compounds. The presence of xenobiotics in the environment has diverse and often detrimental effects on ecosystems and biodiversity. Xenobiotics can lead to water pollution, adversely affecting aquatic [...]

Media Type
    Buy from

    Price may vary by retailers

    Xenobiotics are chemical substances that are not naturally found in the environment but are introduced through human activities. These substances include pesticides, pharmaceuticals, industrial chemicals, and various synthetic compounds. The presence of xenobiotics in the environment has diverse and often detrimental effects on ecosystems and biodiversity. Xenobiotics can lead to water pollution, adversely affecting aquatic organisms. Fish and other aquatic life exposed to these chemicals may experience reproductive, growth, and behavioural issues. Accumulation of xenobiotics in soil can harm plant health and reduce agricultural productivity. These chemicals can also be absorbed by plants, entering the food chain and potentially impacting higher organisms. Some xenobiotics are carcinogenic, mutagenic, or endocrine disruptors. Human exposure to these chemicals can lead to various health problems. Studies on animals have shown that xenobiotics can disrupt organ functions and cause behavioural changes. To mitigate the accumulation of xenobiotics in the environment, biodegradation and bioremediation techniques are employed. These biological methods utilize microorganisms to break down xenobiotics into harmless compounds. However, some xenobiotics degrade very slowly, posing long-term environmental risks. Various regulations and management strategies have been developed to reduce the environmental harm caused by xenobiotics. These include safe chemical usage practices, waste management, and pollution monitoring. In conclusion, understanding and managing the environmental impacts of xenobiotics are crucial for maintaining ecological balance and protecting human health.

    Munire Turhan (Author)
    Bingöl University
    https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3373-1400
    3Dr. Münire TURHAN works in the fields of beekeeping, bee breeding, queen bee production, pollination, bee product production and harvesting, bee product preservation methods, bee diseases and pests, and apitherapy. She is an expert in these fields. She has many scientific studies along with field studies in these fields.

    • Kaftanoğlu, O., 2005. Arıcılıkta Yapay Tohumlama Kursu. 23-25 Mayıs 2005. Ç.Ü. Ziraat Fakültesi. Adana.

    • Rinderer, T.E., 1986. Selection. Edit. Rinderer, T.E., in Bee Genetics and Breeding. Academic Press Ltd. (London). S.:155-176.

    • Collins, A. M., 1986. Quantitative Genetics. Edit. Rinderer, T.E., in Bee Genetics and Breeding. Academic Pres, Inc. London., S.: 283-304.

    • Şengonca, M., 2004. Arı Genetiği ve Islahı. Ege Üniv. Ziraat Fak. Yay. No: 559, Bornova, İzmir.

    • Güler, A., 2006. Bal Arısı (Apis mellifera). O.M.Ü. Ziraat Fakültesi Ders Kitabı No: 55. 574s.

    • Cornuet, J.M., 1986. Population Genetics. Edit. Rinderer, T.E., in Bee Genetics and Breeding. Academic Press, Inc. (London) Ltd., S.: 235-254.

    • Woyke, J., 1986. Sex Determination. Edit. Rinderer, T.E. in Bee Genetics and Breeding. S.:91-120.

    • Woyke, J., 1962. Natural and artificial insemination of queen honey bees. Bee World 43: 21-25.

    • Büchler, R., 1993. Specific combination of Carnica lines to improve productivity and varroa tolerance. Pszczelnicze zeszyty naukowe, Rok XL, Nr 2, S.:119-125.

    • Harbo, J.R., 1984. A comparison of instrumentally inseminated and naturally mated queens. J. Apic. Res. 23: 31-36.

    • Cobey, S., 2004a. The extraordinary honey bee mating strategy and a simple field dissection of the spermatheca. Ohio State Univ., 1735 Neil Ave. Columbus, OH 43210.

    • Cobey, S., 1983a. The development of instrumental insemination. Amer. Bee Journal 123(2): 108-111.

    • Mackensen, O., 1947. Effect of carbon dioxide on initial oviposition of artificially inseminated and virgin queen bees. Jour. Econ. Ent. 40(3): 344-349.

    • Kaftanoğlu, O., YS. Peng, 1980b. A washing technique for collection of honey bee semen. J. Apic. Res. 19(3):205- 211.

    • Schley, P., 1988. An important improvement in the insemination technique of queen honey bees. Justus Liebig University, 6300 Giessen, Otto-Begahel-Strasse 10/D, W. Germany.

    • Cobey, S., Schley, P., 1989. Precision instrumental insemination equipment. Amer. Bee Jour. 129: 322-323.

    • Cobey, S., 1995. Instrumental insemination equipment: sophistication and simplification in designs. Ohio State Univ., 1735 Neil Ave. Columbus, OH 43210, USA.

    • Cobey, S., Schley, P., 2002. Innovation in instrumental insemination. The compact, versatile right and left handed Schley model II instrument. Ohio State University 1735 Neil Ave. Columbus, Ohio USA.

    • Ruttner, F., 1972. Controlled mating and selection of the honey bee. APIMONDIA, 1972, Lunz Am See, Austria.

    • Rinderer, E. T., 1986. Bee Genetics and Breeding. Academic Press, Inc. Ltd. 24-28 Oval Road. London NW1 7DX. London. 425 pp.

    • Ruttner, F., 1988. Breeding Techniques and Selection for Breeding of The Honeybee. The British Isles Bee Breeders Association. Verlag, Munich. 152 pp.

    • Mackensen, O., Nye, W.P., 1966. Selecting and breeding honeybee for collecting Alfalfa. J. Apic. Res., 5: 322- 323.

    • Lodesani, M., Costa, C., 2003. Bee breeding and genetics in Europe. Bee World 84(2): 69-85.

    • Laidlaw, H. H. Jr., 1979. Contemporary Queen Rearing. Dadant and Sons. Hamilton, Illinois.

    • Harbo, J.R., 1986. Propagation and Instrumental Insemination. Edit. Rinderer, T.E., in Bee Genetics and Breeding. Academic Press Ltd. (London). S.:361-390.

    • Kaftanoğlu, O., Y. S. Peng, 1982. Effects of insemination on the initiation of oviposition in the queen honeybee. J. of Apic. Research. 21 (1):3-6.

    • Morse, R.A., 1994. Rearing Queen Honeybees. Wicwas Press; Cheshire, CT, USA; 128p. Page, R.E., Laidlaw, H. H. Jr., 1985. Closed population honeybee breeding. Bee World 66(2): 63-72.

    • Güler, A., H. Alpay, 2005. Reproductive characteristics of some honeybee (Apis mellifera L.) genotypes. J. Anim. Vet. Adv., 4 (10): 859-863.

    • Woyke, J., Jasinski, Z., 1973. Influence of external conditions on the number of spermatozoa entering the spermatheca of instrumentally inseminated honeybee queens. J. Apic. Res., 12: 145-151.

    • Woyke, J., Jasinski, Z., 1976. The influence of age on the results of instrumental insemination of honeybee queens. Apidologie 7(4): 301-306.

    • Harbo, J.R., 1985. Instrumental insemination of queen bee. Stock Center Laboratory, ARS, USDA, Route 3, Ben Hur Road, Baston Rouge, LA 70820.

    • Ruttner, F., 1976. The Instrumental Insemination of the Queen Bees. International Beekeeping Technology and Economy Institute of Apimondia. Bucharest, Romania.

    • Harbo, J.R., 1974. A technique for handling stored semen of honey bees. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Amer. 67: 191-194.

    • Koç, A.U.; Karacaoğlu, M., 2005. Erkek arılarda cinsel gelişim ve çiftleşme davranışı. Teknik Arıcılık 90: 23- 30.

    • Cobey, S., 1983c. Instrumental insemination: The possibility of semen storage. Amer. Bee Journal 123(5): 389-395.

    • Kumova, U., 1992. Çukurova Bölgesi koşullarında yetiştirme mevsiminin ana arı kalitesi üzerine etkilerinin belirlenmesi. Turkish J. Vete. Ani. Sci., 16: 569-577.

    • Cobey, S., 2004b. Instrumental insemination and honey bee breeding. Short Course, June/July. The Ohio State University Rothenbuhler Honey Bee Laboratory Colombus, Ohio.

    • Kaftanoğlu, O., 1990. Arıcılıkta Yapay Tohumlama Kursu, 04-09 Haziran Ç.Ü. Ziraat Fak. Adana. Kaftanoğlu, O.,

    • Cobey, S., 1983b. Instrumental insemination: Current developments and its application today. Amer. Bee Journal 123(4): 284-289.

    • Bodenheimer, FS., 1942. Studies on the honey bee and beekeeping in Turkey. Merkez Zirai Mücadele Enstitüsü Ankara. Numune Matbaası, İstanbul.

    • Adam, B., 1983. In search of the best strains of honeybee. N.Bee Boks, West Yorkshire.

    • Smith, DR; Slaymaker, A; Palmer, M; Kaftanoğlu, O., 1997. Turkish honeybees belong to the east Mediterranean mitochondrial lineage. Apidologie, 28: 269-274.

    • Kandemir , I; Kence, M; Kence, A., 2000. Genetic and morphometric variation in honeybee (Apis mellifera) population of Turkey. Apidologie, 31: 343-356.

    • Guler, A; Bek, Y., 2002. Forewing angles of honey bee (Apis mellifera) samples from different regions of Turkey. J. Apic. Res.; 40: 43-49.

    • Güler, A., Bacaksız, D., 2003. Türkiye’de arıcılığa aktarılan destek ve kaynaklar. Teknik Arıcılık 82: 12-18.

    • Güler, A., Demir, M., 2005. Beekeeping potential in Turkey. Bee World 86(4): 114-119.

    Share This Chapter!