146
Enfeksiyon Hastalıklarında Çalışma Tasarlama Ve Yorumlama
1. John H. Powers III. Designing and Interpreting Clinical Studies in Infectious Diseases. In: Bennett JE, Dolin R, Blaser MJ, eds. Mandell, Douglas, And Bennett’s Prin-
ciples And Practice Of Infectious Diseases, Ninth Edition Philadelphia, PA: Elsevier, Inc; 2020; 668-684
2. Manchikanti L. Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management, part I: introduction and general considerations. Pain
Physician. 2008 Mar-Apr;11(2):161-86.
3. Eisenberg JM, What does evidence mean? Can the law and medicine be reconciled? J Health Polit Policy Law 2001; 26:369-381.
4. Röhrig B, du Prel JB, Blettner M. Study design in medical research: part 2 of a series on the evaluation of scientific publications. Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2009 Mar;106(11):184-
9.
5. Yin RK. Case Study Research : Design and Methods. 4. ed., [Nachdr.]. Sage Ltd USA; 2010;3-4
6. Creswell, J. W. Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. 4th ed.SAGE Publications, USA, 2014; 53-55.
7. Hart, C. Doing a Literature Review: Releasing the Social Science Research Imagination. SAGE Publications. Great Britain. 1998; 4-14
8. A. Erbay. Literatür taraması nasıl yapılmalıdır? Akademisyenin El Kitabı. H. Leblebicioğlu ve S.Ünal ed. Bilimsel Tıp Yayınevi, Ankara, 2013; 1-7.
9. Farrugia, P., Petrisor, B. A., Farrokhyar, F., & Bhandari, M. (2010). Research questions, hypotheses, and objectives. Canadian Journal of Surgery, 53(4), 278-281
10. Richardson, W. S., Wilson, M. C., Nishikawa, J., & Hayward, R. S. (1995). The well-built clinical question: a key to evidence-based decisions. ACP Journal Club, 123(3),
A12-A13.
11. Booth, A., Sutton, A., & Papaioannou, D. (2016). Systematic Approaches to a Successful Literature Review. SAGE Publications.
12. Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. SAGE Publications ; 53-55
13. Kumar, R. (2011). Research Methodology: A Step-by-Step Guide for Beginners. SAGE Publications. Sayfa 71-73
14. Creswell, J. W. Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. SAGE Publications; (2014). 133-135
15. Gordis Epidemiology. Celentano DD, Szklo M eds. 6 th ed. Elsevier, PA, USA; 2019: 147
16. When to Use What Research Design. By W. Paul Vogt, Dianne C. Gardner, and Lynne M. Haeffele. Guilford Publications. New York, NY; 2012:9-15
17. Vandenbroucke JP, von Elm E, Altman DG, Gøtzsche PC, Mulrow CD, Pocock SJ, Poole C, Schlesselman JJ, Egger M; STROBE initiative. Strengthening the Reporting
of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): explanation and elaboration. Ann Intern Med. 2007 Oct 16;147(8):W163-94.
18. Altman, D.G. Practical Statistics for Medical Research (1st ed.). Chapman and Hall/CRC, USA (1991); 102, 200 https://doi.org/10.1201/9780429258589
19. Manchikanti L, Hirsch JA, Smith HS. Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management: Part 2: Randomized controlled
trials. Pain Physician. 2008 Nov-Dec;11(6):717-73.
20. Röhrig B, du Prel JB, Wachtlin D, Kwiecien R, Blettner M. Sample size calculation in clinical trials: part 13 of a series on evaluation of scientific publications. Dtsch
Arztebl Int. 2010 Aug;107(31-32):552-6.
21. du Prel JB, Hommel G, Röhrig B, Blettner M. Confidence interval or p-value?: part 4 of a series on evaluation of scientific publications. Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2009
May;106(19):335-9.
22. Greenland S, Senn SJ, Rothman KJ, Carlin JB, Poole C, Goodman SN, Altman DG. Statistical tests, P values, confidence intervals, and power: a guide to misinterpretations.
Eur J Epidemiol. 2016 Apr;31(4):337-50.
23. Rind DM. Hypothesis testing in clinical research: Proof, p-values, and confidence intervals. https://www.uptodate.com/contents/hypothesis-testing-in-clinical-resear-
ch-proof-p-values-and-confidence-intervals?topicRef=2759&source=see_link . Erişim 04.12.2024
24. Greenland S, Senn SJ, Rothman KJ, Carlin JB, Poole C, Goodman SN, Altman DG. Statistical tests, P values, confidence intervals, and power: a guide to misinterpre-
tations. Eur J Epidemiol. 2016 Apr;31(4):337-50.
25. Goodman SN, Berlin JA. The use of predicted confidence intervals when planning experiments and the misuse of power when interpreting results. Ann Intern Med.
1994 Aug 1;121(3):200-6.
26. Mahutte NG, Duleba AJ. Evaluating diagnostic tests. https://sso.uptodate.com/contents/evaluating-diagnostic-tests?sectionName=Receiver%20operating%20characteris-
tic%20%28ROC%29%20curves&topicRef=2759&anchor=H2913110891&source=see_link#H2913110891 . Erişim 04.12.2024
27. Rivas-Ruiz F, Pérez-Vicente S, González-Ramírez AR. Bias in clinical epidemiological study designs. Allergol Immunopathol (Madr). 2013 Jan-Feb;41(1):54-9.
28. Tripepi G, Jager KJ, Dekker FW, Zoccali C. Selection bias and information bias in clinical research. Nephron Clin Pract. 2010;115(2):c94-9
